Posts tagged: food

Talk on NYC’s Local Food Movement

via NY League of Conservation Voters:

Talk On NYC’s Local Food Movement

Event Date: 04/21/2009
6:30pm - 8:30pm

“Eat locally” has become the new byword of the sustainable food movement. Farmers markets, community gardens, urban farms, and innovative restaurants all play an integral role in promoting fresh, seasonal produce and in supporting local and regional economies.

Join Dan Barber, Executive Chef/Co-owner of Blue Hill at Stone Barns and Blue Hill; Michael Hurwitz, Director of Greenmarket; and Ian Marvy, Director and co-founder with Michael Hurwitz of Added Value and its Red Hook Community Farm, for a panel discussion on being a “locavore” in the country’s largest metropolis. Gabrielle Langholtz, editor of Edible Manhattan and Edible Brooklyn, will moderate the conversation.

RESERVATIONS REQUIRED

NYLCV members should call the Museum’s public programs office to reserve tickets at the discounted price: 917.492.3395, or 212.534.1672, ext. 3395.

$6 NYLCV and Museum Members

*A two-dollar surcharge applies for unreserved, walk-in participants.

Museum of the City of New York

1220 Fifth Avenue at 104th Street

Ideas from Brazil for food justice in NYC

The idea of “food justice” means that all people have equal rights to healthy, nutritious, affordable food.  For example, here in NYC some poorer neighborhoods don’t even have grocery stores in them.  Residents do most of their grocery shopping at bodegas and corner stores where fresh produce is limited, of poor quality, and expensive.  The below article is about a system that is working in Belo Horizonte, Brazil - and many of the same principals would work well right here in New York too.

The City that Ended Hunger

A city in Brazil recruited local farmers to help do something U.S. cities have yet to do: end hunger

by Frances Moore Lappé

“To search for solutions to hunger means to act within the principle that the status of a citizen surpasses that of a mere consumer.” CITY OF BELO HORIZONTE, BRAZIL
In writing Diet for a Small Planet, I learned one simple truth: Hunger is not caused by a scarcity of food but a scarcity of democracy. But that realization was only the beginning, for then I had to ask: What does a democracy look like that enables citizens to have a real voice in securing life’s essentials? Does it exist anywhere? Is it possible or a pipe dream? With hunger on the rise here in the United States-one in 10 of us is now turning to food stamps-these questions take on new urgency.

To begin to conceive of the possibility of a culture of empowered citizens making democracy work for them, real-life stories help-not models to adopt wholesale, but examples that capture key lessons. For me, the story of Brazil’s fourth largest city, Belo Horizonte, is a rich trove of such lessons. Belo, a city of 2.5 million people, once had 11 percent of its population living in absolute poverty, and almost 20 percent of its children going hungry. Then in 1993, a newly elected administration declared food a right of citizenship. The officials said, in effect: If you are too poor to buy food in the market-you are no less a citizen. I am still accountable to you.

The new mayor, Patrus Ananias-now leader of the federal anti-hunger effort-began by creating a city agency, which included assembling a 20-member council of citizen, labor, business, and church representatives to advise in the design and implementation of a new food system. The city already involved regular citizens directly in allocating municipal resources-the “participatory budgeting” that started in the 1970s and has since spread across Brazil. During the first six years of Belo’s food-as-a-right policy, perhaps in response to the new emphasis on food security, the number of citizens engaging in the city’s participatory budgeting process doubled to more than 31,000.

The city agency developed dozens of innovations to assure everyone the right to food, especially by weaving together the interests of farmers and consumers. It offered local family farmers dozens of choice spots of public space on which to sell to urban consumers, essentially redistributing retailer mark-ups on produce-which often reached 100 percent-to consumers and the farmers. Farmers’ profits grew, since there was no wholesaler taking a cut. And poor people got access to fresh, healthy food.

When my daughter Anna and I visited Belo Horizonte to write Hope’s Edge we approached one of these stands. A farmer in a cheerful green smock, emblazoned with “Direct from the Countryside,” grinned as she told us, “I am able to support three children from my five acres now. Since I got this contract with the city, I’ve even been able to buy a truck.”

The improved prospects of these Belo farmers were remarkable considering that, as these programs were getting underway, farmers in the country as a whole saw their incomes drop by almost half.

In addition to the farmer-run stands, the city makes good food available by offering entrepreneurs the opportunity to bid on the right to use well-trafficked plots of city land for “ABC” markets, from the Portuguese acronym for “food at low prices.” Today there are 34 such markets where the city determines a set price-about two-thirds of the market price-of about twenty healthy items, mostly from in-state farmers and chosen by store-owners. Everything else they can sell at the market price.

“For ABC sellers with the best spots, there’s another obligation attached to being able to use the city land,” a former manager within this city agency, Adriana Aranha, explained. “Every weekend they have to drive produce-laden trucks to the poor neighborhoods outside of the city center, so everyone can get good produce.”

Another product of food-as-a-right thinking is three large, airy “People’s Restaurants” (Restaurante Popular), plus a few smaller venues, that daily serve 12,000 or more people using mostly locally grown food for the equivalent of less than 50 cents a meal. When Anna and I ate in one, we saw hundreds of diners-grandparents and newborns, young couples, clusters of men, mothers with toddlers. Some were in well-worn street clothes, others in uniform, still others in business suits.

“I’ve been coming here every day for five years and have gained six kilos,” beamed one elderly, energetic man in faded khakis.

“It’s silly to pay more somewhere else for lower quality food,” an athletic-looking young man in a military police uniform told us. “I’ve been eating here every day for two years. It’s a good way to save money to buy a house so I can get married,” he said with a smile.

No one has to prove they’re poor to eat in a People’s Restaurant, although about 85 percent of the diners are. The mixed clientele erases stigma and allows “food with dignity,” say those involved.

Belo’s food security initiatives also include extensive community and school gardens as well as nutrition classes. Plus, money the federal government contributes toward school lunches, once spent on processed, corporate food, now buys whole food mostly from local growers.

“We’re fighting the concept that the state is a terrible, incompetent administrator,” Adriana explained. “We’re showing that the state doesn’t have to provide everything, it can facilitate. It can create channels for people to find solutions themselves.”

For instance, the city, in partnership with a local university, is working to “keep the market honest in part simply by providing information,” Adriana told us. They survey the price of 45 basic foods and household items at dozens of supermarkets, then post the results at bus stops, online, on television and radio, and in newspapers so people know where the cheapest prices are.

Read the rest of the article at Common Dreams.

Food For Thought Film Festival

This film festival deals with Food and Water - ending hunger, protecting rights to access to water, local and sustainable farming, etc.

Food For Thought Film Fest hits New York City this April 11 and 18, 2009

Please help spread the word and share with your friends, family, colleagues, groups, blogs, social networks, etc.

Naniola Productions in partnership with Action Center to End World Hunger and Columbia University Medical Center Office of Government and Community Affairs presents the third annual Food For Thought Film Festival 2009; a showcase of films about our life sustaining resources: FOOD and WATER.

The festival begins on April 11, 2009 at the Action Center to End World Hunger downtown and will conclude on April 18, 2009 at the Columbia University Medical Center Alumni Auditorium uptown.  This event is FREE to the public to encourage maximum community attendance.   The program will run from 1pm to 8:30pm showcasing four feature length films, three short films, guest speakers, and filmmakers. The detailed schedule and directions can be found at http://www.foodfilmfest.com/schedule.html.

This year’s Film Fest focuses on several crucial issues: access to clean food and water; local and sustainable agriculture; and the effects of policy on small American farmers. Our goal is to promote dialogue within communities and to inspire action. For more information or to make a donation, please visit www.foodfilmfest.com

We invite you to stay for a reception featuring locally made products beginning 8:30pm on April 11, 2009.

April 11, 2009

Action Center to End World Hunger
6 River Terrace
Battery Park, NY

Directions:  A, C, 1,2,3  to Chambers St. OR E to World Trade Center

April 18, 2009
Columbia University Medical Center Alumni Auditorium
650 West 168th St.

Between Broadway and Fort Washington Ave

Directions: A, C, 1 to 168th St. Station

Schedule for Both Events:
1:00pm - Welcome and Introduction
1:30pm - Farm to Cafeteria: A Red Hook Lunch followed by Asparagus: Stalking the American Life
3:45pm - Hot Bread Kitchen; New Amsterdam Market followed by Eating Alaska
6:00pm - FLOW

The World According to Monsanto

Ever wonder what the big deal is about genetically modified crops?  Here is a documentary about it!

Real corn performs better than GM corn in response to climate change

Check out this article from the Organic Consumer’s Association for more details:

Organic Farming Beats Genetically Engineered Corn as Response to Rising Global Temperatures

* Food security and global warming: Monsanto versus organic
By Meredith Niles
Grist Magazine, January 14, 2009
Straight to the Source

Web Note: Here is a link to the abstract of the study if you just want a quick overview. The text of the actual study requires a subscription. Sorry for the confusion.

This week Science published research (sub. req’d) detailing the vast, global food-security implications of warming temperatures. The colored graphics are nothing short of terrifying when you realize the blotches of red and orange covering the better part of the globe indicate significantly warmer summers in coming decades.

The implications of the article are clear — we need to be utilizing agricultural methods and crops that can withstand the potential myriad impacts of global climate change, especially warmer temperatures. The article significantly notes, “The probability exceeds 90 percent that by the end of the century, the summer average temperature will exceed the hottest summer on record throughout the tropics and subtropics. Because these regions are home to about half of the world’s population, the human consequences of global climate change could be enormous.”

Whether you believe global warming is part of a “natural cycle” or a man-made phenomenon is irrelevant. The bottom line is that our earth is rapidly warming, and this is going to drastically affect our food supply. We must undertake both the enormous task of reducing our carbon emissions now to avert the worst, while at the same time adapting our society to the vast and multitudinous effects of unavoidable global climate change. Failing to do either will, as the Science article indicates, have dire effects on a large portion of our world’s population.

Determining the best course of action for ensuring food security in the face of global climate change remains a challenging task. Recognizing that climate change is slated to affect developing countries and small-scale farmers the most is a crucial point. Such understanding enables people to realize that viable solutions must be accessible, affordable, and relevant to the billions of small-scale farmers in the developing world. Unfortunately, it appears that some of the solutions on the table fail to meet these criteria.

Last week, Monsanto made a big public relations splash by filing documents with the FDA regarding a drought-tolerant GM corn variety it is developing with a German company, BASF. Monsanto claims that in field trials, the corn got 6-10 percent higher yields in drought-prone areas last year, but the release is extremely short on details. Regardless of the reality, Monsanto is presenting the corn as a way to help improve on-farm productivity in other parts of the world, notably Africa.

Yet, absent from the media hype were the many technical and social problems with Monsanto’s corn.

A little over a year ago, the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics held a conference specific to drought and drought-tolerant crops. As a follow up, the Australian government’s Grains Research and Development Corporation published a piece detailing the research shared and lessons learned from the conference. One topic addressed was the potential of GM drought-tolerant varieties. In the analysis stated, “The most notable and problematic (effect) is the tendency of drought-tolerant GM lines to not perform as well under favourable conditions. This appears to be the case for CIMMYT’s GM wheat and Monsanto’s GM corn. The flaw is a profound one. It amounts to shifting the yield losses experienced in dry seasons onto the good years.” In essence, farmers might get a small bump in yield during droughts, but will suffer yield losses when conditions are favorable. Considering that climate scientists continually point to increased erratic weather patterns as a symptom of global warming, this reality is clearly disastrous. Surely there must be better solutions that increase production under all weather conditions

One promising solution appeared in an article published in BioScience in 2005. The authors outlined the Rodale Institute’s Farming Systems Trial, a long-term comparison of organic and conventional farming systems conducted between 1981 and 2002. Significantly, the trials found that organic production yielded equivalently to conventional systems after a transition period. Yet even more importantly, Rodale found that in drought conditions in which rainfall was 30 percent less than normal, organic systems yielded 28 to 34 percent higher than conventional systems. Rodale equates the yield gain to increased water retention as a result of higher soil organic carbon. Water volumes percolating through the various systems were 15-20 percent higher in the organic systems as compared with the conventional systems over the 12 year period.  Read the rest…

Fishing in public swimming pool

From City Farmer:

Gone Fishin’ Project - Catch and Eat Trout in a Downtown Toronto Pool
by Michael Levenston

fish.jpg
Photo by Tyler Anderson/National Post

For the past six years, staff at Scadding Park Community Centre have drained the pool of its chlorinated water, filled it with freshwater and dumped in 1,000 rainbow trout for a week of fishing.

So instead of taking people to the fish, Scadding Court brings the fish to them. Several school groups stream through each day; the pool is also open to the public after school hours for $8 per person. Two fish are included in the price, but gutting costs an extra 75 ¢.
“These are inner-city children. They haven’t had these experiences,” said Lynn Fraczkowski, a Grade 1 and 2 teacher at Ogden Junior Public School, who has brought classes here for the past three years. “Once the child has had the experience fishing with their classmates, often they’ll get their family to go, so then it’s family time.”

Sean was looking forward to a tasty meal. “I’m gonna eat ‘em,” he said.

The fishing program is part of Scadding Court’s food access program, noted Lee. “We have an extensive community food project,” said Lee, noting the community gardens and kitchen.

Even the Scadding Court Cafe was offering trout on its menu last week for $5 with rice and salad.

CSA, community gardens, and food in NYC

From Earth Island:

Harvest in the city

New York gardeners bring fresh, healthy food to the less-affluent
By Margarida Correia

Bursts of yellow flowers explode along one side of the Garden of Eden on Weeks Avenue in the Bronx. The 5,000-square-foot community garden is just beginning to unfold, but already it lifts the spirit. A path runs through the garden, taking visitors past tidy 8’ by 10’ plots, where residents will soon begin to grow everything from tomatoes and collard greens to corn, squash, and onions. Crowded into the small garden are three apple trees, a cherry, a nectarine, a plum, a pear, and a huckleberry. A grapevine grows there, along with at least six rose bushes flowering in three different colors. The tiny space is chock-full of wonders.

This urban oasis is a family affair for resident gardener Arlington Malone. His father, Ali, has been in charge of the Garden of Eden ever since it was established in 1989. Malone, 19, tends his own plot of vegetables and practically grew up in the garden.

The Garden of Eden is one of more than 700 community gardens throughout the five boroughs of New York City. Together they account for some 200 acres of land, according to Steve Frillmann, executive director of the Green Guerrillas, a New York City gardening group. Community gardens average about 50 feet by 100 feet – or two lots – in size, but can be as big as five city blocks. Most were built on city-owned abandoned lots.

Aside from the fruit trees, which are communal, members of the Garden of Eden grow primarily for themselves and their families, says Ali Malone. In August, notes son Arlington, people “come with bags to pick the cherries.”

Increasingly, though, the gardens are producing greater and greater amounts of food to sell at farmers’ markets and to donate to soup kitchens and pantries. According to Just Food, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving New York City’s food system, 37 gardens last year produced more than 30,000 pounds of food. One highly productive site – Bissel Gardens in the North Bronx – harvested 2,370 pounds of food. Just Food estimates conservatively that the gardens produce an average of about 800 pounds each.

The emergence of food-producing community gardens in New York City reflects a trend that’s taking root around the world. It’s called urban agriculture. According to the Urban Agriculture Network, a non-governmental organization that supports urban agriculture development worldwide, more than a third of the world’s urban areas are used for farming, with US metropolitan areas producing more than 30 percent of the dollar value of domestic agricultural production. Urban food production is particularly strong in developing countries, where people rely on it to survive. But in developed countries, it’s catching on too.

The rise of urban agriculture, experts say, may be in response to the expansion of cities and the loss of cropland. With diminishing arable land acreage, the theory goes, the conversion of unused lots of urban land into food production areas becomes increasingly important. Interestingly, urban agriculture marks a return to early cities, where food production was part and parcel of daily life.

“Urban agriculture is something that will happen more and more as the population moves into urban areas,” says Kathleen McTigue, manager of Just Food’s City Farms program, which helps New York City communities increase their food production.

In New York City, the largest food-producing gardens are thriving in low-income neighborhoods in Brooklyn and the Bronx, serving areas that don’t have access to fresh, affordable produce and are typically at or near the end of subway lines. While the food is grown primarily for personal consumption, New York City gardeners increasingly grow extra produce to meet the needs of the community.

The focus is bringing community gardens to the “next level” of urban agriculture, says McTigue, referring to the creation of viable farmers’ markets. The idea, she says, is to “use the money from the farmers’ market to bring money back into the garden.”

According to McTigue, more than $21,450 worth of produce was sold through Just Food urban farm stands last year. Urban gardeners produced just under half, with the rest brought in through partnerships with rural farmers. Additionally, six garden sites donated produce to nearby soup kitchens and food pantries.

The United Community Centers (UCC) garden in East New York, Brooklyn, was one such garden. Last year, it donated more than 700 pounds of food to local soup kitchens and sold close to $4,000 worth of food at the nearby farmers’ market. The farmers’ market is a stone’s throw away from the garden, notes Georgine Yorgey, urban agriculture coordinator for United Community Centers, one of four partners that form East New York Farms, a coalition of neighborhood gardening groups.

The half-acre garden near the elevated subway line grows almost exclusively for the farmers’ market open Saturdays from late June to early November. The market occupies almost one full city block and last year drew some 11,500 customers, says Yorgey.

The UCC garden isn’t the only source of produce sold at the farmers’ market. Some 23 resident urban growers in 12 community gardens and three upstate farmers keep the market alive. The farmers bring crops too big to grow in Brooklyn’s community gardens, like pumpkins, corn, and apples.

But the gardens on occasion grow crops that the upstate farmers don’t, and a reciprocal arrangement is born. The UCC community garden, for example, grows collard greens, cherry tomatoes, and cucumbers for one of the farmers that participates in a community supported agriculture, or CSA, program. These programs supply urban dwellers with weekly deliveries of fresh produce from upstate rural farmers.

The UCC garden – run primarily by 13- to 15-year-old student interns and a handful of adult volunteers – is at least four times the size of the miniature Garden of Eden, growing fruit and all kinds of herbs and vegetables. There are two varieties each of mustard greens, eggplants, and cucumbers, and five of peppers – the kind of variety you don’t see on industrial farms, says Yorgey.

Still, the signs of urban poverty are hard to ignore. For a Friday at lunchtime, the streets are silent, with the nearest thoroughfare offering a meager selection of shops and only two small grocery stores – a Spanish bodega and a sun-drenched West Indian market, each with a limited selection of vegetables.

In low-income neighborhoods like East New York, grocery stores are scarce, says Yorgey. The produce is typically low in quality and variety, forcing many residents to go outside the neighborhood for their fruits and vegetables. Yorgey notes that the farmers’ market was formed to help fill the void.

“The farmers’ market tries to provide high quality at an affordable price,” she says. It doesn’t offer the cheapest vegetables – the produce, she says, is cheaper than other farmers’ markets but not cheaper than grocery stores. What the market offers is fresh, quality produce that is grown locally or in upstate small family farms. So fresh is the produce that customers pick their cherry tomatoes right off the vine in the UCC garden.

“The idea is to show people that what they get at the market is different from what they get at the grocery store,” Yorgey says. Local farmers, she cites as an example, don’t store their produce as do large-scale agriculture businesses and focus instead on taste and nutritional value.

But how safe and nutritious can vegetables grown in urban neighborhoods be? While Yorgey and others advise consumers to wash urban-grown food, as one should with any produce, they are comfortable with the safety of the food as it’s grown with soil brought in from the outside and then enriched with compost. This takes care of any pre-existing lead contamination in the ground. Furthermore, crops are grown organically – without pesticides or herbicides – following environmentally friendly production techniques. Crops are rotated, and there’s a great deal of variety within relatively small spaces, unlike industrial agriculture where there are “acres and acres of broccoli,” says Yorgey.
Urban Agriculture
New York City has the most cultivated land of any U.S. city. Photo: Margarida Correia

“When farmers dedicate huge areas to just one crop, there’s a lot of build-up of pests,” she says. In the community gardens, where a mix of crops grows, this isn’t as much of a problem, according to Yorgey.

Even in the larger, more productive gardens, such as Bissel, where entire beds and rows are dedicated to just one crop, there’s a great deal of variety because crops are constantly rotated. And rather than planting everything all at once, crops are staggered so there’s “a harvest on a continuous basis for a few weeks,” says McTigue. That allows gardeners to have a full harvest of beans, for instance, for the market followed by a second harvest two weeks later.

The community gardens are just as environmentally conscientious when it comes to conserving water. The UCC garden uses rainwater from the roof of a nearby house: The water is stored in a large tank. It also employs drip irrigation off a sidewalk hydrant. A drip tape runs along the base of the plants and drips the water slowly, allowing it to soak into the soil better and deeper, says Yorgey. Community gardeners can only water their crops before 7 a.m. and after 7 p.m., when water evaporation is lowest.

New York has the most cultivated land of any US city, says Frillmann of the Green Guerrillas. Still, it trails what’s happening in most of the rest of the world. According to an article in the Times of London, London produces roughly 16,000 tons of vegetables annually. Urban agriculture is especially pronounced in developing countries. According to the Urban Agriculture Network, urban food production in developing countries contributes between 20 percent to 80 percent of the local food supply. For example, Havana – home to 2.1 million people and more than 60,000 patio gardens – grows 60 percent of its vegetables. Cuba became a model for urban agriculture out of necessity. At the end of the Cold War in December 1989, the country lost access to food imports, fertilizers and pesticides from the Soviet Union and had to fend for itself. Today, Cuba has more than 1 million registered patio gardens, all of them organic.

In the United States, cities such as Chicago, Philadelphia, and Detroit have the greatest potential for urban agriculture because the land is underused and not as valuable as in New York, says McTigue. It’s therefore easier, she says, for community gardeners to get “big expansive property” because developers aren’t competing for the space.

And the bigger the property, the greater the food productivity. That’s when urban agriculture kicks into high gear, producing not only for individual family needs, but for markets and pantries, generating what McTigue describes as a “crazy amount of abundance that can be shared with the community.”

Margarida Correia is a writer and editor in New York City.

About food co-ops

Here is a piece from the Guardian UK about successful food co-ops. For info on NY co-ops, check out http://www.localharvest.org/

Supermarkets? No, thanks
Local food-buying cooperatives, which cut out the middlemen between producers and consumers, are taking the country by storm. But how do they work, and how do you set one up?

Unicorn Grocery in Manchester

Unicorn Grocery in Manchester. Photograph: Murdo MacLeod

It’s a bizarre sight: rows of polished church pews, each dotted with neat piles of fruit or veg. Shoppers scoop heaps into baskets, trolleys, or crumpled plastic bags saved from previous trips to Tesco.

This is a weekly food shop, cooperative style - a model of food distribution where neighbours work together to take control of their local supply chain. The system is simple: find a supplier, buy in bulk and collectively cover the costs. Smaller co-ops will only buy what participants have ordered, whereas larger organisations operate as markets or even set up their own shops. Some of these “community” co-ops invite customers to become members. You pay a nominal fee to be able to shop from it, or have a say in how it is run. Others are more informal and open to all. There are also “workers’” co-ops, which are often much larger organisations, where paid employees share all key business decisions.

The concept, of course, is far from new, but it’s proving increasingly popular. “Interest is definitely growing,” says John Atherton of Co-operatives UK, an organisation that supports cooperative enterprise across Britain. “We’re seeing rising numbers of buying groups and community shops. It’s a trend that is set to continue.”

The motivations are many: fears about food security; food inflation; the power of supermarkets; the bruised image of capitalism; a lost sense of community.

Across Britain, food co-ops are sprouting up in school halls, community centres, farm sheds or even your neighbour’s front room - anywhere, in fact, where rent is free.

“I use the term ‘trust trading’,” says Dan Dempsey, manager of a project establishing food co-ops in Wales. In essence, he says, it’s about a return to traditional routes of trade: reconnecting farmers with communities, and countryside to cities; paying a fair price and avoid markups by middlemen.

With strong backing from the Welsh assembly, his team has helped to launch 180 food co-ops in the last three years, supplying 6,000 families and turning over around £1m. “We’re cracking the system,” he says. “Supermarkets don’t have to dominate.”

It was this notion of trust that inspired the Rochdale Pioneers, established in 1844 and widely regarded as the first successful food co-op. At the time, food adulteration was commonplace. Unscrupulous traders were known to whiten flour with alum (plaster of paris) and dry used tea leaves before reselling them. Not much has changed: from the current scare over pork contaminated with dioxins, to the melamine-in-baby-milk scandal in China, the parallels could not be more striking.

Trealaw Food Co-op, Rhondda Valley, Wales

Nestled in the Rhondda Valley, Trealaw is a long, thin strip of houses barely two streets wide. This post-industrial swathe of Wales boasts an Aldi, a Lidl and an Asda. Yet Trealaw Food Co-op still manages to have around 200 members. Every Thursday morning they collect their pre-ordered bags of fruit and vegetables from the local church. For £3 you get what would cost you about £7 in the local supermarket.

“Word is spreading,” says member Faye Jones. “We offer the personal touch, the way it used to be in the shops.” The nearby school collates orders from teachers and parents and a local wholesaler delivers the produce.

Volunteers divvy it up into bags and pop in recipe cards and leaflets from local organisations such as Age Concern.

“We’re always trying something new,” explains Jones, who also revels in the social aspect: “They are not members as such; they are friends.”

• Details: 01443 444 591

Unicorn Grocery, Manchester

“Equal pay, equal say,” is the slogan of this worker’s co-op in south Manchester. It’s your dream whole-foods shop: brightly lit, well-stocked; run by motivated, happy staff.

Since it opened in 1996, annual turnover has reached £3.5m. “We’re all ‘member owners’, not unskilled supermarket employees,” explains founder Adam York.

Staff share business decisions and earn a flat rate of pay. A quarterly bonus is weighted by length of service. Recently, Unicorn began to grow its own produce in a market garden nearby. To boost production, last month the company bought 21 acres of prime growing land 14 miles west of the shop.

Customers helped to raise the capital after being invited to invest in “loanstock”, a type of five-year fixed term bond, setting their own interest rate anywhere between 0 and 6%. “We like to think that this model - which has been around for quite a while - is about to come into its own,” says York.

• Details: unicorn-grocery.co.uk

Just Trade, Lewes, East Sussex

“It’s always a fun night,” says coordinator Keith Rapley, describing Just Trade’s bi-monthly shopping evening. Established in 1995, the emphasis is on dry goods. Local honey and apple juice are available as well as 300 items from Infinity, a cooperative distributor based in Brighton. It costs £6 per year to be a member. About 80 members download their order form from the website, and then collect their goods from a local school.

“It’s a good way to stay out of the supermarkets,” says member Lorraine Serrecchia. She prefers to spend her money in the community, and supplements her Just Trade order with fresh produce from local shops.

• Details: justtrade.org; 01273 473651

St Andrew’s Food Co-op, London

Father Martin believes in throwing his church doors wide open. Every Tuesday, while members come to stock up on fresh produce, volunteers run a creche in one corner and a coffee morning in another. The co-op has 50 regulars, who pick up enough fruit or veg to keep a family of four going for a week for £3, ordered a week in advance. Only 10 or so of them worship at the church. There’s no, “Here’s your banana; here’s your Bible,” explains Martin.

A market trader from nearby North End Road delivers its order en route back from the wholesalers. “It’s the opposite of going to Waitrose,” says Martin. “It’s so cheap; no packaging or plastic bags; minimal food miles.”

Joanna Dugdale has been a member for six months. She appreciates the ethical virtue, she says, but what most impresses is the value: “My gripe with the supermarkets is that they really overcharge for healthy food.”

• Details: standrewsfulham.com; 0207 385 5023

Food For All, Bristol

This project started small: “It was a just a cupboard in an office,” laughs 77-year-old Lola Hardingham, co-op member and volunteer. It now occupies a proper shop, which is open five days a week. The neighbourhood is far from affluent: “People always turn up their noses about Hartcliffe,” she says.

Stock is organic and local: fruit and veg from a community market garden; meat and cheese from a farm shop; dry goods from Essential, a wholesaler and workers’ co-op based in the city. Anyone can shop, but co-op members, who pay £2 annually, receive a 10% discount. Current membership is around 200. Volunteers also run stalls in old people’s homes, sheltered housing and community centres.

Sales are up and down. “The shop’s a bit quiet,” says Zoe Templar, manager.
Regulars blame Morrison’s, who have recently opened nearby.

• Details: foodforallbristol.org.uk; 0117 9647 228

True Food Co-op, Reading

A chunky Isuzu lorry, running on biodiesel, is a familiar sight on the streets of Reading. It is stuffed with fridges, trestle tables and a vast range of foodstuffs. True Food runs an average of five markets each week, typically at community centres. Members buy shares (it’s up to them how much they pay) which entitle them to have a say in how it is run, with all profits invested back into the business or the community. Membership stands at 140. The website includes a list of tasks for volunteers to sign up for.

It has been a decade’s work for Chris Aldridge, a founder member. The organisation began life as an informal buying group, and now has an annual turnover of around £400,000. “I’m amazed and proud,” says Aldridge. “We turned something that met once a month into a cooperative that involves a whole community, from all walks of life.”

6th street CSA

If anyone lives in the Lower East Side and wants to join a CSA, check out the one at the Sixth Street Community Center.

A movement that brings together
city residents and farmers
in mutually beneficial partnerships.

Local residents are guaranteed fresh organic produce by purchasing shares in farmers’ harvests at the start of the growing season thereby ensuring their farms are adequately capitalized. This arrangement allows our local farmers to concentrate on growing and harvesting quality crops without the additional burden of marketing, an exhausting proposition for their generally small operations.

For six years the Sixth Street Community Center CSA has provided its members with the freshest and best tasting produce available from our local farms. Since 1996 over 200 different varieties of vegetables and herbs are provided every season- May to November- from Catalpa Ridge Farm, our partner organic farm located in rural Sussex County, New Jersey.

This year our CSA expanded its offering to include a wide variety of fruits from Hepworth Farm, located on the banks of the Hudson River in Milton, New York. Our CSA also joined with Prime Select Seafoods, a fishery in Cordova, Alaska to become the first CSA in the country to offer wild Alaskan salmon, halibut, cod and rockfish to its members. In a state where industrial fish farming is prohibited, Alaska’s fisheries- in particular its salmon runs- are rated among the healthiest and best managed in the world.

More on Farming and the Government

This NY Times opinion piece makes some good points about our current agricultural practices and soil erosion.  It’s interesting to see how many articles about farming there have been in the past couple of months.  This is a more pressing issue I think than most of us realize.

January 5, 2009
Op-Ed Contributors
A 50-Year Farm Bill
By WES JACKSON and WENDELL BERRY

THE extraordinary rainstorms last June caused catastrophic soil erosion in the grain lands of Iowa, where there were gullies 200 feet wide. But even worse damage is done over the long term under normal rainfall — by the little rills and sheets of erosion on incompletely covered or denuded cropland, and by various degradations resulting from industrial procedures and technologies alien to both agriculture and nature.

Soil that is used and abused in this way is as nonrenewable as (and far more valuable than) oil. Unlike oil, it has no technological substitute — and no powerful friends in the halls of government.

Agriculture has too often involved an insupportable abuse and waste of soil, ever since the first farmers took away the soil-saving cover and roots of perennial plants. Civilizations have destroyed themselves by destroying their farmland. This irremediable loss, never enough noticed, has been made worse by the huge monocultures and continuous soil-exposure of the agriculture we now practice.

To the problem of soil loss, the industrialization of agriculture has added pollution by toxic chemicals, now universally present in our farmlands and streams. Some of this toxicity is associated with the widely acclaimed method of minimum tillage. We should not poison our soils to save them. Read more »

WordPress Themes